Emery Unified
July 1st 2005 – June 30th 2008
“The role of technology within education is to support, enhance and expand the curriculum we deliver to boost student achievement; improve and increase the level of efficiency of communication to promote collaboration; And to provide teachers, students and parents with the information they need to ensure academic success.”
“To create a matrix of space which provides ready, easy, and reliable access to useful technology; to have a technology confident and knowledgeable staff that is empowered by resources of information and communication; to make the student-to-technology interaction a system consistent with real-world applications and experiences; to empower parents with readily available information about their student’s academics.”
Donovan Moretz, Technology Associate ESS
Lisa Taymuree, Technology Associate AYES
Stakeholder
This plan was formed from the input of parents, community
and staff. The District’s Literacy and Math plans built the foundation for this
document. Parents and community gave a
large amount of feedback on planning near the end of the 2003/2004 school year
during a School Site Council meeting.
This document has also been reviewed and commented on by district staff,
various planning committee’s, the district superintendent, the
Reviewed By Director of Curriculum
Reviewed By School Board
Reviewed By Principal
Reviewed By Principal
Reviewed By CTAP Representative
Table of Contents
Curriculum and Technology - 4
Technology Access and Use - 5
District Curricular Goals and Plans - 6
Curriculum Goals - 7
Curriculum Monitoring - 11
Curriculum Technology Programs - 12
Curriculum Technology Program Narratives - 13
Professional Development - 15
Professional Development Goals - 16
Professional Development Monitoring - 18
Infrastructure - 19
Infrastructure Systems - 20
Infrastructure Implementation Goals - 23
Infrastructure Implementation Narratives - 25
Infrastructure Implementation Monitoring - 27
Budget - 28
Budget – Operations and Salaries 2005 - 29
Budget Considerations - 30
NETS Chart - 36
Appendix C – Criteria for EETT-Funded
Educational
Technology Plans - 44
Curriculum
and Technology
The
purpose of the Curriculum portion of the technology plan is to identify how and
where technology can best assist in the delivery of learning materials by (1)
Curriculum Augmentation, (2) Technology Infusion, and (3) Data Tracking.
Curriculum
augmentation is the process of supplementing instructional materials to better
deliver the subject material. Curriculum
is often augmented to provide students with similar learning materials over a
different medium to address a student’s specific need or just to make the learning
process more engaging for all. An example
would be providing a student who is an English language learner with audio
books that would help them achieve the knowledge necessary for their success by
using a form of information delivery that they may absorb faster than written.
Technology
infusion is the process of adding technology lessons underneath the core
curriculum in a mostly transparent way.
In this, a student’s learning, practice and eventual mastery of a
technology skill may be transparent to the project at hand. An example would be a research assignment
followed by a class presentation.
Whereas the lesson involved may be the research and report on the
extinction of an ancient civilization, a student may be learning, practicing
and mastering skills such as; Internet research, typing, working with the MS
Windows desktop, and how to properly use MS PowerPoint.
Data
tracking is the process of logging student assessment information in a way that
can be used to make Data Driven Decisions.
Data tracking must be performed in a way that is informative and useful
to many people to support academic success in a variety of ways; for a student,
a class or an entire school. Examples
would be that properly tracked data could help teachers identify a pattern in a
students learning trends or a gap in their classes achievement of a state
standard. It can also assist in any
needs assessment review by revealing where a school site needs improvement.
Technology
Access and Use
Computer Lab, Internet
Access, Document Workspace
Access
to computer-based technology at Anna Yates is very widespread. In addition to the campus computer lab, each
classroom has a bank of 1-7 computers.
Computer lab access is limited to class time and is teacher
supervised. All computers on campus are
connected the district-wide computer network and provided with Internet
access. All students and staff have
workspaces on the network where they can save and work from their files.
Current limitations in
computer access require more computers in family homes and more computers, or
“mini-labs” to be installed in and in-between classrooms.
Currently
the district is using a number of technology applications to promote teaching
and learning through the use of hardware and software. The district has just begun to implement
Edusoft standards-based data tracking software to increase Math teacher
awareness of student success as it is mapped to state Curriculum
standards. We also have Geometers Sketch
Pad and Fathom (Algebra) Math software implemented to augment the curriculum by
making it more engaging and easier to deliver.
After noticing a serious need for reading intervention, we began
implementing Read-180, a fully technology integrated curriculum. Our Read-180 program is now being implemented
across the entire school district. We
also utilize a number of skill building applications such as Math Blasters (for
various levels of math) and Arthur’s Reading (for various reading levels).
Although
the
District
Curricular Goals and Plans

The
Emery USD Library Plan
Emery USD Master Plan for English Language Learners
Emery USD Math Plan
Emery USD Professional Development Plan
Emery USD Strategic Science Plan
Emery USD Visual and Performing Arts Plan
Through
these plans, the district has set goals to achieve the curricular and content
standards throughout the K-12 environments, specifically with a focus on Math
and
“GOAL 1: To
create a vibrant school reading culture at Emery Secondary School focused on
increasing achievement of the CA English Language Arts Reading Standard
2.0 “by grade twelve, students read two million words annually on their own,
including a wide variety of classic and contemporary literature, magazines,
newspapers, and online information.”
GOAL 2: To develop a
standards-based English Language Arts instructional program designed to meet
the literacy needs of all our students.
GOAL 3: To accelerate
struggling students to grade level performance through intensive interventions.
GOAL 4: All ESS staff work
together to build students’ literacy skills.
GOAL 5: All ESS staff will
have the professional development and support they need to achieve the school’s
literacy goals.”
- Literacy Plan
“All students throughout the
7-12 mathematics program are engaged in standards-based, core mathematics
curriculum. Starting in 2004-05, the curricular objectives for the mathematics
courses offered at ESS will begin a 5-year transition period.
For each grade level or math
course, teachers work with one another and with Mathematics content coaches to
develop yearlong,
standards-based curriculum maps, develop a plan for textbook use – implementation,
augmentation, and sequencing – and identify necessary additional instructional
materials.
Administrators provide
teachers throughout the mathematics program with a written statement of school
policies regarding instructional minutes for compliance with state standards
for instructional minutes within mathematics.
At the end of this
transition, all students will be expected to demonstrate mastery of their
respective grade level/subject area standards”
- Math Plan
Curriculum Goals
|
(EUSD “Three Big Goals”
Goal #3) (Literacy Plan Goal) (Math Plan Goal) |
||||
|
Yates |
Actuals |
Year 1
Benchmarks |
Year 2
Benchmarks |
Year 3
Benchmarks |
|
ELA (CST) |
2004/2005 |
2005/2006 |
2006/2007 |
2007/2008 |
|
|
Student% /( Growth%) |
Student% /( Growth%) |
Student% /( Growth%) |
Student% /( Growth%) |
|
Advanced |
6.5%/(16%) |
8.6%/(10%) |
11.3%/(10%) |
14.9%/(10%) |
|
Proficient |
21.4%/(18%) |
26.3%/(20%) |
36.3%/(35%) |
47.2%/(45%) |
|
Basic |
35.3%/(18%) |
36.0%/(30%) |
32.4%/(40%) |
28.3%/(60%) |
|
Below Basic |
26.0%/(43%) |
22.5%/(40%) |
17.4%/(60%) |
8.5%/(60%) |
|
Far Below Basic |
10.8% |
6.5% |
2.6% |
1.0% |
|
Math (CST) |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|
Advanced |
9.8%/(36%) |
12.0%/(10%) |
15.2%/(10%) |
19.7%/(10%) |
|
Proficient |
21.5%/(41%) |
32.1%/(40%) |
44.8%/(50%) |
53.8%/(50%) |
|
Basic |
31.9%/(39%) |
31.9%/(40%) |
26.9%/(50%) |
19.4%/(50%) |
|
Below Basic |
31.9%/(57%) |
21.8%/(55%) |
12.0%/(50%) |
6.6%/(50%) |
|
Far Below Basic |
4.9% |
2.2% |
1.1% |
0.6% |
|
ESS |
Actuals |
Year 1
Benchmarks |
Year 2
Benchmarks |
Year 3
Benchmarks |
|
ELA (CST) |
2004/2005 |
2005/2006 |
2006/2007 |
2007/2008 |
|
Advanced |
3.3%/(7%) |
4.3%/(10%) |
6.0%/(10%) |
9.0%/(10%) |
|
Proficient |
10.2%/(-6%) |
17.3%/(20%) |
29.6%/(35%) |
46.2%/(50%) |
|
Basic |
40.5%/(36%) |
40.2%/(30%) |
39.2%/(50%) |
32.9%/(60%) |
|
Below Basic |
26.0%/(23%) |
26.2%/(40%) |
22.1%/(75%) |
10.7%/(60%) |
|
Far Below Basic |
20.1% |
12.0% |
3.0% |
1.2% |
|
Math (CST) |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|
Advanced |
0.3%/(-3%) |
0.6%/(10%) |
1.2%/(10%) |
2.8%/(10%) |
|
Proficient |
2.6%/(5%) |
6.0%/(20%) |
16.3%/(35%) |
44.2%/(60%) |
|
Basic |
18.2%/(10%) |
31.2%/(30%) |
49.2%/(60%) |
39.0%/(65%) |
|
Below Basic |
55.4%/(29%) |
48.2%/(40%) |
29.8%/(75%) |
12.5%/(60%) |
|
Far Below Basic |
23.4% |
14.1% |
3.5% |
1.4% |
|
Year |
Activity |
Resource |
Person(s)
Responsible |
|
|
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 |
4th
– 12th grade students identified as 2 or more years below grade
level will be placed in Read 180 intervention program. |
Read
180 Computer Lab |
Literacy Team |
|
|
2005-2006 |
Grade level
teachers will implement the electronic resources accompanying the Prentice
Hall language arts and history textbooks |
Prentice
Hall computer based lesson support |
Literacy
Team History
Dept Technology
Associate Coaches |
|
|
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 |
Track
library book turnover using Follett software to identify reading increases
and decreases on annual basis. |
Follett
Library System |
Librarian Technology
Associate (ess) |
|
|
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 |
Continue
implementation of robotics program for 6th grade students |
2
Robotics Computers |
6th
Grade Teacher |
|
|
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 |
K-6 students will use computer resources in the lab to reinforce and au | |||